Good for APS

From the The Albuquerque Tribune:

The Albuquerque Board of Education is developing a policy that tells U.S. Border Patrol agents to keep out: Campuses are a safe haven for immigrant students.

Board members said they don’t want any confusion: Border Patrol and immigration agents are not welcome at district schools.

In NewMexiKen’s view, a thoughtful move. Illegal immigration is a problem; illegal immigrants are not. Officials should be dealing with the systemic issues and quit making individuals a scapegoat for a lack of thoughtful national policies.

Facts, facts, I just want the truth

As he often does, The Daily Howler simplifies things, this time whether Bush is proposing “cuts” (as the Democrats say) or “increases” (as the White House puts it).

Who is “right” in this dispute? For our money, the claim that benefits would “increase” under Bush is far more misleading than the claim that they’re “cut.” But that is always a matter of judgement. Again, here are the facts that we would lay out to help people see the shape of Bush’s proposal. Note that you don’t have to use the disputed word “cut” to describe the basic facts that are involved here:

First: At present, middle-income retirees get a check from SS that equals roughly 36 percent of their previous income. Everyone agrees on that fact.

Second: Under the Pozen plan, such retirees would instead get 26 percent of their pre-retirement income. Everyone agrees on that, too.

Third: The Pozen plan only resolves about 70 percent of the system’s projected solvency problem. (Everyone agrees on that.) If Bush wants to fix the solvency problem without adding new revenue, he may have to set benefit levels even lower than he has said—at perhaps 20 percent.

Conclusion? At present, middle-income earners get about 36 percent of their income replaced by SS when they retire. Under Bush’s plan, that may be 20 percent instead. Just state those facts to the average person. Trust us: You won’t have to say the word “cuts.” And they won’t think of this as an “increase.”

I mean really, if Somerby can explain it so succinctly, why can’t the mainstream media?

Reality television

From a report in The New York Times:

Stephen Colbert, who plays a phony correspondent on the fake-news program “The Daily Show,” is getting a real promotion.

Comedy Central said yesterday that it was giving Mr. Colbert his own show: a half-hour that is expected to follow “The Daily Show” on weeknights and will lampoon those cable-news shows that are dominated by the personality and sensibility of a single host. Think, he said, of Bill O’Reilly and Chris Matthews and Sean Hannity.

How will we know the difference between the funny shows and the comedy shows?

Best line of the day, so far

“Have you heard the latest? They’re now saying that Jennifer the runaway bride could be charged for reporting a false crime and could face a year in prison. Gotta be tough on her lawyer if she’s charged. You know trying to convince the judge she’s not a flight risk.”

Jay Leno

Don’t look down

Michael Ventura suggests America is like Wile E. Coyote — a few steps past the cliff, only we haven’t looked down yet. It’s a fascinating, if depressing column. His key point:

Gas prices can only go up. Oil production is at or near peak capacity. The U.S. must compete for oil with China, the fastest-growing colossus in history. But the U.S. also must borrow $2 billion a day to remain solvent, nearly half of that from China and her neighbors, while they supply most of our manufacturing (“Benson’s Economic and Market Trends,” quoted in Asia Times Online) — so we have no cards to play with China, even militarily. (You can’t war with the bankers who finance your army and the factories that supply your stores.) China now determines oil demand, and the U.S. has no long-term way to influence prices. That means $4 a gallon by next spring, and rising — $5, then $6, probably $10 by 2010 or thereabouts. Their economy can afford it; ours can’t. We may hobble along with more or less the same way of life for the next dollar or so of hikes, but at around $4 America changes. Drastically.

And it was $3.199 in Needles last week.

Thanks to dangerousmeta! for the link.

Haymarket Affair

The Haymarket meeting and bombing, the subsequent riot, arrests, trial, and executions, and related events of the period form one of the most remarkable episodes in the history of Chicago, the United States, and of working people everywhere. On the evening of May 4, 1886, a few thousand people assembled in the Haymarket area at the intersection of Randolph and Desplaines Streets, across the South Branch of the Chicago River about eight blocks west of City Hall. The purpose of the rally was to protest the killing of two workers the previous day by the police when they broke up an angry confrontation between locked-out union members and their replacements at the McCormick reaper factory on the city’s Southwest Side. This confrontation was one of many outbreaks of violence at the time due to labor and class tensions. Central among labor’s demands was the eight-hour workday.

As the protest meeting in the Haymarket was nearing a close, about 180 police marched from the nearby Desplaines Street station to the makeshift speakers’ stand. Immediately after a police commander ordered the rally to disperse, someone threw a dynamite bomb into the ranks of the officers. One officer was killed almost instantly, and six more would die in the next few days and weeks of wounds either caused by the bomb or sustained in the riot that followed. Acting with overwhelming public support, the police arrested dozens of political radicals. In the trial that followed, eight anarchists were found guilty of murder. After appeals to the Illinois and United States Supreme Courts failed, four of the defendants were executed on November 11, 1887. One day before the hangings, another defendant committed suicide. Illinois Governor Richard Oglesby commuted the capital sentence of two other defendants to life in prison. The jury had sentenced the eighth defendant to fifteen years at hard labor.

Scholars have long considered the Haymarket trial one of the most notorious miscarriages of law in American history. At this time of cultural crisis, the defendants were convicted by a prejudiced judge and jury because of their political views, rather than on the basis of solid evidence that linked them to the bombing. Although most middle-class Americans and even many working people at the time cheered this action and praised the police as defenders of public order, the executions transformed the anarchists into martyrs of labor in this country and throughout the world. The cultural memory of Haymarket has echoed ever since through many other events.

The above excerpted from the excellent The Dramas of Haymarket, an online project produced by the Chicago Historical Society and Northwestern University.

The Crooner

Harry Lillis Crosby was born on this date in 1903. Known as “Bing” from a childhood nickname, he was:

[W]ithout doubt, the most popular and influential media star of the first half of the 20th century. The undisputed best-selling artist until well into the rock era (with over half a billion records in circulation), the most popular radio star of all time, and the biggest box-office draw of the 1940s, Crosby dominated the entertainment world from the Depression until the mid-’50s, and proved just as influential as he was popular. Unlike the many vocal artists before him, Crosby grew up with radio, and his intimate bedside manner was a style perfectly suited to emphasize the strengths of a medium transmitted directly into the home. He was also helped by the emerging microphone technology: scientists had perfected the electrically amplified recording process scant months before Crosby debuted on record, and in contrast to earlier vocalists, who were forced to strain their voices into the upper register to make an impression on mechanically recorded tracks, Crosby’s warm, manly baritone crooned contentedly without a thought of excess. …

His influence and importance in terms of vocal ability and knowledge of American popular music are immense, but what made Bing Crosby more than anything else was his persona — whether it was an artificial creation or something utterly natural to his own personality. Crosby represented the American everyman — strong and stern to a point yet easygoing and affable, tolerant of other viewpoints but quick to defend God and the American way — during the hard times of the Depression and World War II, when Americans most needed a symbol of what their country was all about.

John Bush for the All Music Guide

And, of course, he’s the artist with the best-selling record of all time: White Christmas.

Bush-whacked

• The president knew in advance [the First Lady] was going to speak, but he never saw the material. Basically, same way he handles his intelligence briefing.

• President Bush said today that the social security is going bankrupt. The good news is that won’t happen for at least 50 years and by then you won’t have to worry about social security because the temperature will be 158 degrees!

Jay Leno

Ah, yes, the politicians of the Old Dominion

Billmon at Whiskey Bar has close tabs on Virginia’s Senators:

Back in the early ’80s, when I lived in Virginia, one of our Senators (not John Warner, but a senile old fart named Scott) was voted the dumbest man in the U.S. Senate. As it happened, I actually had met Scott once or twice, and I can’t say the honor was undeserved.

Nor was it unusual. The Old Dominion has been producing politiicans of very little brain for many years now — a case of reversion to the mean, I suppose, after giving the nation the likes of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison.

Even by the state’s contemporary standards, though, Allen is a dunce. One of the few politiicans, in fact, who could make people refer to John Warner as “the smart one.”

Which, needless to say, could make him a hot prospect for the GOP presidential nomination.

Click on the link above to see what Allen said and the Whiskey Bar parry.

May 3rd is the birthday …

… of Pete Seeger. The writer of “Turn, Turn, Turn” and “Where Have All the Flowers Gone” is 86. (Of course, the lyrics to “Turn, Turn, Turn” are from Ecclesiastes.)

… of James Brown. The Godfather of Soul is 72.

… of Greg Gumbel. He’s 59. (Brother Bryant is 56.)

… and of Dulé Hill. That’s Charlie on West Wing. He’s 30.

Doom and gloom

Andrew Tobias has some scary thoughts: Are We Lagging Technologically? Here’s his concluding words:

And what are we to make of the notion that our kids go to school 180 days a year, while our competition’s kids go to school 240 days a year? Can this bode well for our relative prosperity 20 and 40 years from now?

Or of the more recent Tom Friedman column in which he quoted Bill Gates — “American high schools are obsolete . . . [E]ven when they are working exactly as designed, they cannot teach our kids what they need to know today.” Friedman translated Gates’s comments this way: “If we don’t fix American education, I will not be able to hire your kids.”? And he noted that “neither Tom DeLay [nor] Bill Frist called a late-night session of Congress — or even a daytime one — to discuss what Mr. Gates was saying. They were too busy pandering to those Americans who don’t even believe in evolution.”

Which perhaps brings me to the last bad sign of late — according to an NBC news poll, about 65% of us do not believe in evolution.

Have I mentioned frequently enough that any equity portfolio should include international index funds as well as domestic?

Seal of approval

Good Housekeeping — the magazine not the behavior — made its debut 120 years ago today, May 2, 1885. It was founded in Holyoke, Massachusetts.

The Hearst Corporation purchased Good Housekeeping in 1911.

On the case

In The New Yorker Jeffrey Toobin takes a look at Martha Stewart’s probation. Did she violate by attending Time‘s party? Here’s the essential facts as discussed in the article:

On April 19th, Martha Stewart attended a cocktail party and gala dinner, at the Time Warner Center, that was billed as a “celebration” of Time‘s “100 Most Influential People” issue. The evening seems to have been convivial, although Jon Stewart (no relation), who performed at the party, did note, after Martha’s departure, that he had seen her “fashion a shiv out of a lamb shank.” Her attendance raised certain questions, however, because, influential or not, she remains under home confinement after her conviction, last year, for, among other things, making false statements to federal prosecutors. The terms of Stewart’s probation allow her to leave home for up to forty-eight hours a week for “employment,” medical and dental appointments, food shopping, and religious observance. The question that Stanton’s office is now investigating is whether the party constituted a genuine work obligation or mere socializing.

A thoughtful, if not particularly well articulated, question

Joel Achenbach asks how Europeans might approach settlement if it were 1492, the Americas hadn’t been “discovered,” but the Europeans had today’s sensibilities and ethical considerations.

Good discussion among the comments.

For NewMexiKen’s part, I think the question assumes that global-strategic ethics have improved over the past 500 years. That, I believe, is doubtful.

Oh, great, now all the brides will runaway here

From AP via The Santa Fe New Mexican:

ALBUQUERQUE — Georgia’s runaway bride arrived in this desert city on a Greyhound bus with nothing but the clothes on her back.

She left on a first-class airplane seat, carrying souvenirs and sporting a new wardrobe. The airfare was thanks to her family. The clothing and souvenirs were courtesy of the police and FBI agents she befriended.

Moved by the plight of Jennifer Wilbanks, authorities from several law enforcement agencies went beyond the call of duty — giving her a teddy bear, an FBI cap and polo shirt, a tote bag, meals and even a shoulder to cry on — to make her daylong stay here comfortable.

Inborn inclinations

Scientific American has an article on the continuing debate, His Brain, Her Brain. An excerpt:

Several intriguing behavioral studies add to the evidence that some sex differences in the brain arise before a baby draws its first breath. Through the years, many researchers have demonstrated that when selecting toys, young boys and girls part ways. Boys tend to gravitate toward balls or toy cars, whereas girls more typically reach for a doll. But no one could really say whether those preferences are dictated by culture or by innate brain biology.

To address this question, Melissa Hines of City University London and Gerianne M. Alexander of Texas A&M University turned to monkeys, one of our closest animal cousins. The researchers presented a group of vervet monkeys with a selection of toys, including rag dolls, trucks and some gender-neutral items such as picture books. They found that male monkeys spent more time playing with the “masculine” toys than their female counterparts did, and female monkeys spent more time interacting with the playthings typically preferred by girls. Both sexes spent equal time monkeying with the picture books and other gender-neutral toys.

Because vervet monkeys are unlikely to be swayed by the social pressures of human culture, the results imply that toy preferences in children result at least in part from innate biological differences. This divergence, and indeed all the anatomical sex differences in the brain, presumably arose as a result of selective pressures during evolution. In the case of the toy study, males–both human and primate–prefer toys that can be propelled through space and that promote rough-and-tumble play. These qualities, it seems reasonable to speculate, might relate to the behaviors useful for hunting and for securing a mate. Similarly, one might also hypothesize that females, on the other hand, select toys that allow them to hone the skills they will one day need to nurture their young.

Muir’s Scribble Den

ScribbleDen.jpg

This is the study, or “scribble den,” where John Muir worked from 1890 until his death in 1914, producing some of the classics of American nature writing.

Why should man value himself as more than a small part of the one great unit of creation?
 
 
 
SierraClubCup.jpg
The metal cup on the desk, easily hung on a belt, was a badge of membership in the Sierra Club, which Muir co-founded in 1892.

In the bowl on the mantle were balls of dried bread; Muir’s snack food.

I never saw a discontented tree. They grip the ground as though they liked it …