The Battle of Piestewa Peak

The name of Squaw Peak in north-central Phoenix was changed to Piestewa Peak last year to honor Army Pfc. Lori Piestewa, the first female American Indian soldier to be killed in combat. Piestewa, a Hopi mother of two, was killed last March 23rd, when her company was ambushed near Nasiriyah, Iraq.

Now there appears to be an effort in the Arizona legislature to reverse the name change, presumably because Gov. Janet Napolitano strong-armed the State Board on Geographic and Historic Names into bypassing normal procedures.

As reported by E.J. Montini in The Arizona Republic:

[O]ne of the first things Arizona legislators hope to accomplish this year involves finding a way for state government to once again sanction the word “squaw.”

In particular, a large group of Republican legislators is very interested in returning Spc. Lori Piestewa to the status of squaw by restoring the name of the Phoenix mountain that was changed last year in her honor.

The legislative effort is led by Rep. Phil Hansen of Peoria, Arizona.

Hansen is a fifth-generation Arizonan who has had long and honorable careers in both the private sector and the military.

“Those people who give the final sacrifice for their country I hold in the highest regard,” he said. “But I don’t hold Lori Piestewa in any higher regard than any other person from Arizona who died for their country. And the fact that she may be the first American Indian woman to die in the service of the United States to me is immaterial. To me she’s still a soldier and should have no more recognition than any other person that that happened to.”

Perhaps we honor all of our lost soldiers when we honor any one. After all, we would not say that naming Luke Air Force Base after one man did a disservice to the others from Arizona who gave their lives over foreign skies, would we? Besides, if we change the name of Piestewa Peak now, it means going back to squaw, which would be like going back about 100 years to a time when calling a native woman such a thing was acceptable. Would anyone do it now? Would Hansen?

“For the first part of my life I rarely came face to face with an Indian,” said Hansen, who’s 71. “They were very reclusive. You’d see them on the street in Phoenix selling baskets or pottery or whatever. More recently I don’t know that the subject has ever come up. I have a dictionary that has a date of 1977 on it. I looked up squaw and it doesn’t say anything about it being derogatory.”

He said he wouldn’t use the term to describe a Native American woman now, but not because it was insulting. Only because it wasn’t contemporary and had a more “historical quality” to it. Perhaps like those historical words we once used to describe African-Americans. If the governor were asked to approve one of those words for a landmark I’d hope she would do what she should do if a “Squaw Peak” bill lands on her desk. Veto it.

Read the entire Montini column.

Charles Curtis…

was born in Kansas on this date in 1860. Curtis was the 31st vice president of the United States, serving under President Herbert Hoover, 1929-1933. Curtis is the only person with non-European ancestry to ever serve as President or Vice President. His mother was part Kansa or Kaw, Osage and Potawatomi and part French. Curtis had a one-eighth Indian blood quantum.

Curtis served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1893 to 1907, and in the U.S. Senate from 1907 to 1913 and 1915 to 1929. He was Republican whip from 1915-1924 and majority leader from 1925-1929.

A description of the book Mixed-Bloods and Tribal Dissolution: Charles Curtis and the Quest for Indian Identity (1989) provides this background on Curtis.

A successful lawyer and Republican politician, Curtis had spent his early years on a reservation but grew up comfortably and fully integrated into the white world. By virtue of his celebrated status, he became the most important figure in the debate over federal Indian policy during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

As the Indian expert in Congress, Curtis had significant power in formulating and carrying out the assimilationist program that had been instituted, particularly by the Dawes Act, in the 1880s. The strategy was to encourage reservation Indians to reject communal life and reap the rewards of individual enterprise. Central to these developments were questions of ownership, land claims, allotments, tribal inheritance laws, and what constituted the public domain. The underlying issues, however, were Indian identification and assimilation. The government’s actions–affecting schools, the federal courts, Indian Office personnel, allotment and inheritance laws, mineral leases, and the absorption of the Indian Territory into the state of Oklahoma–all bore the mark of Curtis’s hand.

Returning calls important

From the Los Angeles Times

Retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark on Monday accepted a minor endorsement that was as much a dig at Dean as it was support for Clark.

Vermont’s Abenaki Nation Indian tribe — which clashed with the former governor over official state recognition — announced its support of Clark at an event in Concord, N.H. The 6,000-member tribe tossed its endorsement to Clark because he isn’t Dean, tribal leaders said, and because the Clark campaign was the only one to return their calls and messages.

Tatanka-Iyotanka…

was killed on this date in 1890.

Sitting Bull was a Hunkpapa Lakota chief and holy man. He was born around 1831 on the Grand River in present-day South Dakota. He became a warrior in a battle with the Crow at age 14, subsequently becoming renowned for his courage in fights with the U.S. Army.

In 1874, an expedition led by George Armstrong Custer confirmed the discovery of gold in the Black Hills, an area that had been declared off-limits to white settlement by the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868. When efforts by the government to purchase the Black Hills failed, the Fort Laramie Treaty was abrogated. All Lakota not settled on reservations by January 31, 1876, would be considered hostile. Sitting Bull led his people in holding their ground.

As the PBS web site New Perspectives on The West describes it:

In March, as three columns of federal troops under General George Crook, General Alfred Terry and Colonel John Gibbon moved into the area, Sitting Bull summoned the Lakota, Cheyenne and Arapaho to his camp on Rosebud Creek in Montana Territory. There he led them in the sun dance ritual, offering prayers to Wakan Tanka, their Great Spirit, and slashing his arms one hundred times as a sign of sacrifice. During this ceremony, Sitting Bull had a vision in which he saw soldiers falling into the Lakota camp like grasshoppers falling from the sky.

Inspired by this vision, the Oglala Lakota war chief, Crazy Horse, set out for battle with a band of 500 warriors, and on June 17 he surprised Crook’s troops and forced them to retreat at the Battle of the Rosebud. To celebrate this victory, the Lakota moved their camp to the valley of the Little Bighorn River, where they were joined by 3,000 more Indians who had left the reservations to follow Sitting Bull. Here they were attacked on June 25 by the Seventh Cavalry under George Armstrong Custer, whose badly outnumbered troops first rushed the encampment, as if in fulfillment of Sitting Bull’s vision, and then made a stand on a nearby ridge, where they were destroyed.

Public outrage at this military catastrophe brought thousands more cavalrymen to the area, and over the next year they relentlessly pursued the Lakota, who had split up after the Custer fight, forcing chief after chief to surrender. But Sitting Bull remained defiant. In May 1877 he led his band across the border into Canada, beyond the reach of the U.S. Army, and when General Terry traveled north to offer him a pardon in exchange for settling on a reservation, Sitting Bull angrily sent him away.

Four years later, however, finding it impossible to feed his people in a world where the buffalo was almost extinct, Sitting Bull finally came south to surrender. On July 19, 1881, he had his young son hand his rifle to the commanding officer of Fort Buford in Montana….

Though well-known for his appearances with the Buffalo Bill Wild West show, Sitting Bull actually was only with the show for four months in 1885, during which he was paid $50 a week to ride once around the arena.

Returning to Standing Rock, Sitting Bull lived in a cabin on the Grand River, near where he had been born. He refused to give up his old ways as the reservation’s rules required, still living with two wives and rejecting Christianity, though he sent his children to a nearby Christian school in the belief that the next generation of Lakota would need to be able to read and write.

Soon after his return, Sitting Bull had another mystical vision, like the one that had foretold Custer’s defeat. This time he saw a meadowlark alight on a hillock beside him, and heard it say, “Your own people, Lakotas, will kill you.” Nearly five years later, this vision also proved true.

In the fall of 1890, a Miniconjou Lakota named Kicking Bear came to Sitting Bull with news of the Ghost Dance, a ceremony that promised to rid the land of white people and restore the Indians’ way of life. Lakota had already adopted the ceremony at the Pine Ridge and Rosebud Reservations, and Indian agents there had already called for troops to bring the growing movement under control. At Standing Rock, the authorities feared that Sitting Bull, still revered as a spiritual leader, would join the Ghost Dancers as well, and they sent 43 Lakota policemen to bring him in. Before dawn on December 15, 1890, the policemen burst into Sitting Bull’s cabin and dragged him outside, where his followers were gathering to protect him. In the gunfight that followed, one of the Lakota policemen put a bullet through Sitting Bull’s head.

Tatanka-Iyotanka describes a buffalo (bison) sitting on its haunches.

American Indian tribal names

The names by which most ‘tribes’ are generally known are usually not those which they use for themselves: often they are derived from the more-or-less disparaging terms their neighbors used to describe them to early European traders and explorers. (For a rough equivalent, imagine visitors from another planet arriving in England, asking who lived across the channel, and being given the answer ‘Bloody Frogs’.)

From The Earth Shall Weep by James Wilson

America’s sweetheart

“The tropical emotion that has created a legendary Sacajawea awaits study by some connoisseur of American sentiments. I have referred to the statement…that more statues have been erected to her than to any other American woman. Few others have had so much sentimental fantasy expended on them. A good many men who have written about her, including a couple with some standing as historians, have obviously fallen in love with her. Almost every woman who has written about her has become Sacajawea in her inner reverie. And she has received what in the United States counts as canonization if not deification; she has become an object of state pride and interstate rivalry.”
Bernard DeVoto, Course of Empire

And this was written 48 years before the Sacagawea dollar.

Congress grants Interior reprieve on Indian trusts

DenverPost.com

“The Senate gave final approval Monday night to a deal, hustled through Congress in a spending bill, delaying for at least a year a judge’s order that the federal government conduct a full accounting of botched records of Indians dating back to 1887. Norton has estimated the accounting will cost between $6 billion and $12 billion….”

“The deal angered the plaintiffs, who have fought the Interior Department through two presidential administrations. They called it an end-run around a court decision in their favor, but they said that’s exactly why it won’t work.

Attorney Dennis Gingold said constitutional separation of powers prevents Congress from interfering in a lawsuit.

“It’s unconstitutional,” Gingold said. ‘It has about as much effect as a cup of Starbucks coffee.'”

American Indians and Alaska Natives

The Bureau of the Census reports that there were an estimated 4.3 million American Indians and Alaska natives, or American Indians and Alaska natives in combination with one or more other races, as of July 1, 2002 — 1.5 percent of the total population.

3.1 million are American Indians and Alaska natives who claim membership in a specific tribe.

American Indian tribes with more than 50,000 members are Cherokee, Navajo, Choctaw, Blackfeet, Chippewa, Muscogee (Creek), Apache and Lumbee. Cherokee is easily the largest, with a population of 697,400 who are Cherokee alone or in combination with one or more other races or tribes. Tlingit is the largest Alaska native tribe, with 17,200 members. Other Alaska native tribes with 5,000 or more members are Alaskan Athabascan, Eskimo and Yup’ik.

538,300 American Indians and Alaska natives live on reservations or other trust lands. Of this number, 175,200 reside on Navajo nation reservation and trust lands, which span portions of Arizona, New Mexico and Utah.

Who Owns Native Culture?

Commenting on the use of the name Redskins (as in Washington Redskins) he writes: ”Native American cultures have survived five centuries of pestilence, military conflict and dispossession. Compared to these catastrophes, in what meaningful sense does the name of a professional football team put their survival at risk? One could argue just as convincingly that petty insults actually promote cultural survival by bringing Indians together in solidarity against the dominant culture.”

From review of Who Owns Native Culture? by Michael F. Brown in The New York Times. Read a discussion of the Hopi-Voth controversy from the first chapter here.

Is the name denigrating — or not?

ESPN’s Tuesday Morning Quarterback (TMQ) opens this week’s column with news:

[T]hat Federal judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly is expected to rule soon in the marathon 11-year lawsuit against the Potomac Drainage Basin Indigenous Persons and their ‘R*dsk*ns’ trademark.

TMQ objects to both ends of the ‘Washington’ R*dsk*ns name. The front end: This club practices in Virginia and performs in Maryland, lacking the decency to so much as maintain an office in Washington. The back end: R*dsk*ns is a slur. Fans don’t mean to denigrate anyone, of course; fans view the name as mere tradition. A slur it is, nonetheless. What if the mere traditional name were the Washington Darkies?

There is a 1946 federal statute prohibiting the government from registering a trademark that disparages any race, religion or other group. In 1999 the Patent and Trade Mark Office agreed that the name “Redskins” was a violation of that law. The team could keep the name if it chose — and owner Dan Snyder is adamant about keeping it — but it would no longer be able to protect its rights to market the team name and logo. TMQ says that would cost the team $5 million in lost revenue annually.

NewMexiKen agrees with the Indian critics, and with the Patent and Trademark Office, that the name is derogatory. Further, I don’t like the team or its owner and am happy to see them sweat. I’m pretty certain however, that there is not a consensus among American Indians on this issue. As one example, check out the Red Mesa High School Redskins of Teec Nos Pos, Arizona.