I don’t Twitter despite having an account and, sorry Facebook friends, but I don’t find much value to Facebook either except for what my daughters and daughters-in-law post there.
Old fogey or astute, you decide.
I don’t Twitter despite having an account and, sorry Facebook friends, but I don’t find much value to Facebook either except for what my daughters and daughters-in-law post there.
Old fogey or astute, you decide.
Comments are closed.
Ken,
Old Fogey.
John Orr
Hang tough, friend. I am signed up on Twitter, but I don’t tweet. I am not even signed up on Facebook. I just…can’t.
My votel? Astute because I couldn’t possibly be an old fogey! 🙂
As someone with over 5,400 updates on twitter, I’ll say old fogey.
Might it possibly have something to do with the fact that you already have an established tool for expressing yourself online – one you regularly use several times a day?
Yeah, that too. I feel I’m good for 31 posts more max.
[An example. I read this morning that ABC had some stupid report with stupid rich people about income taxes that revealed that none of them knew what he or she was talking about. I started to write a post about it and decided who cares. WIthin an hour or so all the big time bloggers were posting about it. The moral of the story is what difference does it make whether I did or did not blog about it? Nearly 15,000 posts, two million words, and no method to my madness in sight.]
[See Wealthy Idiots Meet Idiot Reporter]
How about astute, old fogey?
Or a dumb, whippersnapper?
Astute and old fogey are not opposites.
Astute.
I find Twitter an excellent way to keep in touch with my good friends. Especially my best friend in Austin. Kind of a non-intrusive IM. That’s about it. At first, I tried using it as an actual micro-blog, but I quickly figured out I’m just not that interesting any more.
I find Facebook so far beyond boring I can’t stand it.
Maybe I’m an old fogey, too.
As far as writing about subjects many others have written about, I personally enjoy your perspective/viewpoint on things.