The answers from the candidates are actually rather interesting. Whom do you think gives the best answer? Worst?
Of course, their concerns about the environment are meaningless compared to how the presidential candidates take their coffee, when they do.
You know life is bad when the only cappa drinker of the lot is John McCain who is running in the anti-latte Republican party. We’re doomed. Where is the Starbucks lobbyists when we need him or her?
Oh, I did reads the global warming answers too, but they did nothing to fruther enlighten me.
I thought there was an interesting spectrum — from denial, to generalities, to some solutions, to Richardson’s specifics.
Richardson’s the only one who seems to have noted that effects are occurring faster than the worst case predictions. I hope the candidates are looking at something other than CAFE standards which Detroit has historically met with attorneys to get the mileage improvment