Limiting the Damage

Times Select is free this week, so you can follow the link and read Krugman’s whole column, but here’s a key part:

President Bush isn’t on the ballot tomorrow. But this election is, nonetheless, all about him. The question is whether voters will pry his fingers loose from at least some of the levers of power, thereby limiting the damage he can inflict in his two remaining years in office.

At this point, nobody should have any illusions about Mr. Bush’s character. To put it bluntly, he’s an insecure bully who believes that owning up to a mistake, any mistake, would undermine his manhood — and who therefore lives in a dream world in which all of his policies are succeeding and all of his officials are doing a heckuva job. Just last week he declared himself “pleased with the progress we’re making” in Iraq.

In other words, he’s the sort of man who should never have been put in a position of authority, let alone been given the kind of unquestioned power, free from normal checks and balances, that he was granted after 9/11. But he was, alas, given that power, as well as a prolonged free ride from much of the news media.

One thought on “Limiting the Damage”

  1. I’ve been wondering about something. Let’s say that the Democrats get majorities in the House and Senate.

    Will Bush’s aids tell him, or will they let him continue to believe the Republicans are in power?

    Or, if someone does tell him that the Democrats have regained the majorities, will that aid then be fired?

Comments are closed.