Archive for May 4, 2005

Numismatic nirvana

WASHINGTON, DC—Following the success of its 50 State Quarters program—deemed one of the most popular commemorative-coin programs in American history—the U.S. Mint announced its next ambitious project: releasing a unique penny for every county in the nation.

“Located in the first state in the union, Delaware’s Kent County will be the first county honored in this grand celebration of America,” U.S. Mint Director Henrietta Holsman Fore said Monday. “But over the coming years, citizens all across the nation will see the best aspects of their own counties celebrated on the obverse side of a penny. Collecting all 3,143 county pennies will be a fun activity your family will enjoy for generations.”

Starting in 2006, the U.S. Mint will release five new pennies per year for the next 629 years. While the process will be a long one, residents of the nation’s 3,143 counties and county equivalents have already begun debating how their regions should be depicted.

The Onion

Best line of the day, so far

“Anybody who has ever lost a quarter in a Coke machine should be terribly afraid of what we’re probably gonna be forced to vote with.”

Juanita’s: The World’s Most Dangerous Beauty Salon, Inc.

Getting more than her allotted 15 minutes

If you’re old enough to remember Herb Alpert’s Tijuana Brass, go take a look at The One and Only.

TijuanaBrass.jpg

Link via Boing Boing

Worth thinking about when you head to the store

Wages.gif

Chart from The New York Times. Found at Pandagon.net.

Cheesy

Maybe Jennifer just ran on account of all the cheesy wedding gifts:

Among the items purchased at her registry: a cheese wire slicer ($9.99), a two-piece cheese server set (that’s one knife and one slicer for $29), a cheese server (that’s a tray, not a person — $35), a full cheese set (marble serving board, cheese knife, cracker tray — $49), a set of four cheese spreaders ($29), and, best of all, the mighty and essential “Cheese Dome” ($19).

Keith Olbermann

Good for APS

From the The Albuquerque Tribune:

The Albuquerque Board of Education is developing a policy that tells U.S. Border Patrol agents to keep out: Campuses are a safe haven for immigrant students.

Board members said they don’t want any confusion: Border Patrol and immigration agents are not welcome at district schools.

In NewMexiKen’s view, a thoughtful move. Illegal immigration is a problem; illegal immigrants are not. Officials should be dealing with the systemic issues and quit making individuals a scapegoat for a lack of thoughtful national policies.

Facts, facts, I just want the truth

As he often does, The Daily Howler simplifies things, this time whether Bush is proposing “cuts” (as the Democrats say) or “increases” (as the White House puts it).

Who is “right” in this dispute? For our money, the claim that benefits would “increase” under Bush is far more misleading than the claim that they’re “cut.” But that is always a matter of judgement. Again, here are the facts that we would lay out to help people see the shape of Bush’s proposal. Note that you don’t have to use the disputed word “cut” to describe the basic facts that are involved here:

First: At present, middle-income retirees get a check from SS that equals roughly 36 percent of their previous income. Everyone agrees on that fact.

Second: Under the Pozen plan, such retirees would instead get 26 percent of their pre-retirement income. Everyone agrees on that, too.

Third: The Pozen plan only resolves about 70 percent of the system’s projected solvency problem. (Everyone agrees on that.) If Bush wants to fix the solvency problem without adding new revenue, he may have to set benefit levels even lower than he has said—at perhaps 20 percent.

Conclusion? At present, middle-income earners get about 36 percent of their income replaced by SS when they retire. Under Bush’s plan, that may be 20 percent instead. Just state those facts to the average person. Trust us: You won’t have to say the word “cuts.” And they won’t think of this as an “increase.”

I mean really, if Somerby can explain it so succinctly, why can’t the mainstream media?

Reality television

From a report in The New York Times:

Stephen Colbert, who plays a phony correspondent on the fake-news program “The Daily Show,” is getting a real promotion.

Comedy Central said yesterday that it was giving Mr. Colbert his own show: a half-hour that is expected to follow “The Daily Show” on weeknights and will lampoon those cable-news shows that are dominated by the personality and sensibility of a single host. Think, he said, of Bill O’Reilly and Chris Matthews and Sean Hannity.

How will we know the difference between the funny shows and the comedy shows?

Best line of the day, so far

“Have you heard the latest? They’re now saying that Jennifer the runaway bride could be charged for reporting a false crime and could face a year in prison. Gotta be tough on her lawyer if she’s charged. You know trying to convince the judge she’s not a flight risk.”

Jay Leno

Don’t look down

Michael Ventura suggests America is like Wile E. Coyote — a few steps past the cliff, only we haven’t looked down yet. It’s a fascinating, if depressing column. His key point:

Gas prices can only go up. Oil production is at or near peak capacity. The U.S. must compete for oil with China, the fastest-growing colossus in history. But the U.S. also must borrow $2 billion a day to remain solvent, nearly half of that from China and her neighbors, while they supply most of our manufacturing (”Benson’s Economic and Market Trends,” quoted in Asia Times Online) — so we have no cards to play with China, even militarily. (You can’t war with the bankers who finance your army and the factories that supply your stores.) China now determines oil demand, and the U.S. has no long-term way to influence prices. That means $4 a gallon by next spring, and rising — $5, then $6, probably $10 by 2010 or thereabouts. Their economy can afford it; ours can’t. We may hobble along with more or less the same way of life for the next dollar or so of hikes, but at around $4 America changes. Drastically.

And it was $3.199 in Needles last week.

Thanks to dangerousmeta! for the link.

Haymarket Affair

The Haymarket meeting and bombing, the subsequent riot, arrests, trial, and executions, and related events of the period form one of the most remarkable episodes in the history of Chicago, the United States, and of working people everywhere. On the evening of May 4, 1886, a few thousand people assembled in the Haymarket area at the intersection of Randolph and Desplaines Streets, across the South Branch of the Chicago River about eight blocks west of City Hall. The purpose of the rally was to protest the killing of two workers the previous day by the police when they broke up an angry confrontation between locked-out union members and their replacements at the McCormick reaper factory on the city’s Southwest Side. This confrontation was one of many outbreaks of violence at the time due to labor and class tensions. Central among labor’s demands was the eight-hour workday.

As the protest meeting in the Haymarket was nearing a close, about 180 police marched from the nearby Desplaines Street station to the makeshift speakers’ stand. Immediately after a police commander ordered the rally to disperse, someone threw a dynamite bomb into the ranks of the officers. One officer was killed almost instantly, and six more would die in the next few days and weeks of wounds either caused by the bomb or sustained in the riot that followed. Acting with overwhelming public support, the police arrested dozens of political radicals. In the trial that followed, eight anarchists were found guilty of murder. After appeals to the Illinois and United States Supreme Courts failed, four of the defendants were executed on November 11, 1887. One day before the hangings, another defendant committed suicide. Illinois Governor Richard Oglesby commuted the capital sentence of two other defendants to life in prison. The jury had sentenced the eighth defendant to fifteen years at hard labor.

Scholars have long considered the Haymarket trial one of the most notorious miscarriages of law in American history. At this time of cultural crisis, the defendants were convicted by a prejudiced judge and jury because of their political views, rather than on the basis of solid evidence that linked them to the bombing. Although most middle-class Americans and even many working people at the time cheered this action and praised the police as defenders of public order, the executions transformed the anarchists into martyrs of labor in this country and throughout the world. The cultural memory of Haymarket has echoed ever since through many other events.

The above excerpted from the excellent The Dramas of Haymarket, an online project produced by the Chicago Historical Society and Northwestern University.

Kent State

Today, May 4, is an excellent day to listen to Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young’s Ohio.

It’s been 35 years.